Monday 01 / July / 2024
Paris: The various campaign promises being made by the far right and far left ahead of France's snap elections on June 30 and July 7 all have something in common: they will all be very, very expensive to carry out.
Whether they call for lowering the retirement age back to 60, raising the minimum wage or granting blanket tax exemptions to everyone under 30, each campaign promise is another potential multi-billion-euro threat to France's already empty coffers.
But where will the money come from? Neither the far right nor the far left has an answer.
Friedrich Heinemann, a public finance expert at the German-based Leibniz Center for European Economic Research (ZEW), says the promises being made by France's populists mirror a broader "radicalization of economic policy."
"Those are entirely unrealistic economic programs. They were written for Nirvana but not for today's French economy," Heinemann told DW.
France's rotten state finances
Europe's second-largest economy is already groaning under a mountain of debt equaling roughly 110% of GDP. Last year, France's trade deficit was running at about 5.5% of the country's overall economic output.
Both mean trouble when measured according to the EU's Maastricht Treaty, which only allows for a 3% trade deficit and a maximum sovereign debt of 60% of GDP.
Things could get worse. It is estimated that the campaign promises being made by the far right and far left could add as much as €20 billion ($21.4 billion) annually in new spending to the budget.
Some experts say that this is a conservative estimate, and that the plans could be costlier still.
But what will the European Union do if a new populist government simply ignores the Maastricht criteria? "There's just no Plan B for that," Lorenzo Codogno told DW.
Codogno, who previously worked at Italy's Ministry of Finance, is currently based in London, where he is a macroeconomic advisor for institutional investors.
The situation in Italy looks even worse than it does in France. In 2023, Rome ran a deficit of 7.4% and debt was a whopping 140% of GDP.
But unlike French President Emmanuel Macron, conservative Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's job is safe.
'The euro will suffer'
Although he doesn't "see a scenario that will break the euro" in the wake of French election, Codogno says he does seee one in which "all of Europe's institutions arrive at a stalemate and nothing gets done."
He says everything would then come to a grinding halt, sapping all political initiative.
"That could be problematic if the US and China were to enter a trade war at a time of global geopolitical instability with two wars already raging near Europe's borders," Codogno said.
It could also impact the external value of the common EU currency. "One can justifiably claim that the euro would suffer, not just asset value, but the currency," the financial expert said.
No protections against populist economic policy
The strict parameters of the Maastricht criteria were eased during the coronavirus epidemic and have remained more flexible since. The eurozone's latest framework for steering economic policy only recently went into effect, on April 30, 2024.
There are still limits for debt and deficit, but the new framework gives nations far more wiggle room regarding how and when they get their financial house in order.
Still, Codogno fears that may not be enough for some countries. "France could become the first country to intentionally flout the new fiscal framework agreements," he said.
The blackmail potential posed by highly indebted states is real. To date, debt and deficit transgressions by individual states have suffered little consequence from the European Commission or the European Central Bank (ECB).
"That's exactly the problem the ECB has maneuvered itself into over the past few years by consistently saying ... we're here to help," said Friedrich Heinemann.
He says it was a blessing that the ECB could help countries in need during a crisis like the pandemic, "but the ECB simply cannot be the entity tasked with keeping euro-economies afloat at any cost — even when their problems were caused by irrational economic policies," the debt expert said. "That would give the wrong signal."
Who's controlling the controllers?
Heinemann is critical of the fact that the European Commission has also been far too lenient on debtor nations in the past.
He feels the key role that the European Commission plays in enforcing debt rules is one of the central design flaws of the entire eurozone system.
As a de-facto government, the EU is ill-equipped to be "a neutral arbiter when it comes to member states taking on debt," he said.
"Because it is always in a situation in which it has to enter negotiations with a member state in order to arrive at a compromise."
Heinemann would like to see more oversight from the European Fiscal Board (EFB), which evaluates whether the European Commission accurately assesses member states' financial situations and whether it is correctly applying Stability and Growth Pact measures.
Regrettably, says Heinemann, the EFB has absolutely no political say.
Extorting cash transfers from northern EU member states
"But if the European Commission continues to operate so politically — that is, to continue to opt for political compromise rather than getting tough — then I see dark days when it comes to debt accumulation in the eurozone," Heinemann said.
The motive of those voting for populist parties in France underline Heinemann's point.
"Those voters are saying: We know the policies that we are voting for won't work. But by voting for them we can force cash transfers from Northern Europe — and that is far better than having to deal with austerity measures here at home."
That must be stopped, he warned. "Otherwise, we will have a massive problem when it comes to acceptance of the EU in Northern Europe."
