New Delhi: The suspense over wrestler Narsingh Yadav's Olympic participation was on Saturday prolonged further after the National Anti-Doping Agency deferred its final verdict on the doping scandal to Monday.
The National Anti Doping Agency (NADA) hearing on Saturday went on for marathon eight hours.
NADA DG Navin Agarwal said the panel studied a lot of documents on Saturday and will give its verdict on Monday.
"The panel again sat today and reviewed the whole case. The panel will give its verdict at 4 pm on Monday," Agarwal told reporters.
"The reason for marathon meeting and the delay in declaring the verdict as a lot of documents needed to be studied and the arguments have been lengthy. We are hopeful that justice will be done," he added.
WFI President Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh refused to comment anything as the case is still sub-judice.
Narsingh had returned positive for methandienone -- a banned anabolic steroid, following which Narsingh cried foul, claiming that the entire episode was a conspiracy against him.
Narsingh has already been replaced by Parveen Rana in the Olympic bound squad.
During the earlier two days of hearing on Narsingh's dope positive case, he and his lawyers presented their case on the failed dope test, which, according to them, was a conspiracy against the grappler, but NADA's legal team gave its arguments against the sabotage theory before the disciplinary committee.
Narsingh's hopes of competing in the Olympics had faded further on Wednesday after the wrestler failed a second dope test, which was conducted on him on July 5. He was already under provisional suspension for failing a June 25 dope test.
Moreover, the wrestler's final effort to establish a conspiracy theory also fell flat as one of the two cooks, who had claimed to have seen a junior wrestler mixing something in Narsingh's food at the SAI Sonepat centre's mess, changed his testimony in front of the three-member NADA panel.
The panel had summoned two cooks on the request of Narsingh's lawyer Vidushpat Singhania on Friday.
Earlier, the argument put forth by NADA was that Narsingh was not eligible for remission, which he had been asking for, because he failed to establish that he did not commit any fault or negligence.
"Since he has not been able to establish how the banned substance had entered his body, we argued that he should be given punishment," NADA's lawyer Gaurang Kanth had said at the end of the hearing on Thursday.
"Narsingh did not produce the relevant circumstantial evidence that there could have been sabotage as had been claimed by them. They filed an affidavit that his drinks or water was spiked but they did not produce the evidence to prove it to satisfy NADA or WADA Code," he had argued.